Jimmy Yang vs Alessandro Procopio Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L W L L
Form
W L W L W L W L W LH2H: Yang 1 - 0 Procopio
They have played 3 sets in total, with Yang winning 2 and Procopio winning 1. The last match between Yang and Procopio was at the M15 Heraklion, 30-11-2021, Q3, Hard with Jimmy Yang getting the victory 6-1 2-6 10-6.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jimmy Yang | 1 |
| Alessandro Procopio | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-6 10-6 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jimmy Yang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Jimmy Yang
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Jimmy Yang
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Yanjie Zheng
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yong Joon Park
Player
Jimmy Yang
36%
(
34 of
95)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
103)
6
Aces
13
12
Double Faults
9
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
15 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Minghui Zhang
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Jimmy Yang
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jimmy Yang
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
84%
(
41 of
49)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shaoyun Liu
Player
Jimmy Yang
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Jimmy Yang
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Barki
Player
Jimmy Yang
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alessandro Procopio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Alessandro Procopio
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Procopio
Player
Ioannis Xilas
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Moraing
Player
Alessandro Procopio
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Procopio
Player
Dawid Taczala
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
28%
(
12 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
55 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 13-11 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45% (77/95) | Win/Loss | 47% (48/55) |
| 46% (179/209) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (105/127) |
| 49% (1850/1957) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1073/1105) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 615 | Aces Total | 23 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 504 | Total Double Faults | 73 |
| 1:11:11 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 292.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 285.76 |
| 57% (4418/7741) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1058/1767) |
| 70% (3092/4418) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (620/1058) |
| 45% (1503/3323) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (319/709) |
| 43% (287/667) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (82/168) |
| 38% (2966/7778) | Return Points Win % | 41% (683/1646) |
| 44% (76/171) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (48/103) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (28/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (7/18) |
| 40% (17/43) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (17/26) |
| 80% (88/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (40/35) |
| 20% (88/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (40/5) |
| 7% (84/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (63/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
